Computers Cannot Replace Teachers Free Essays.
Next, I will refer to the second reason why computers should not replace teachers. As for the second reason, computers can’t lead students to good learners. According to Lindsay (2011), a computer cannot develop personal distinction between students. It cannot develop creative or innovative ideas for teaching materials in the new way. It cannot comment on papers, providing students with.
Title: Microsoft Word - Can Technology Replace Teachers.docx Author: Damian Kavanagh Created Date: 20120917201137Z.
Technology Will Not Replace Teachers. By Jeff Dunn and Katie Dunn. 430. There is an onslaught of technology on the modern classroom. Teachers, administrators, parents, and students alike are being told that technology is the whetstone with which we can all sharpen our education system. Technology can open doors, expand minds, and change the world. That may be true, but it's not the panacea.
Robots cannot replace teachers in classrooms. China and other countries to use robots to teach reminds me of the mid-80s when computers were introduced into classrooms. There was a lot of hype.
It can help the process of learning, but it certainly cannot replace the role of the teacher. Even in online courses, we see that teachers are necessary to give lectures, whether in the form of videos, tutorials or via Skype sessions. Children still need to learn computers, which of course are taught by teachers.
In order to replace teacher, AI need a set of super power computers with millions cores and millions sensors. Teaching activities involve complex tasks such as understanding students psychology.
Computers cannot replace teachers because human touch is more important than computers and personal presence of teachers arouse children's interest.